• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Todd
  • OVERRUN book website
  • America’s Covert Border War book
  • Awards
  • Book Todd to Speak

Todd Bensman

From Journalism to Counterterrorism Intelligence - and Back.

  • Securing Borders
  • Terrorism & Homeland
  • Todd In the News
  • Congressional Testimony
  • My War In Bosnia Essay

New Terrorism Case-In-Point: Why Somalia Is on the Travel Ban List and Must Stay There

September 11, 2018 by Todd Bensman

This entry is part 6 of 11 in the series America's Security Vetting Failures
Series

America's Security Vetting Failures

  • Preventing Espionage and Terrorism: The Real Purpose Behind Trump’s Proposals for Foreign Student and Exchange Visitor Visas
  • Out of Yemen, a Reminder About What May Happen Without “Extreme Vetting” and “Travel Ban” Policies
  • Indictment of Pakistani Doctor H1-B Visa Holder for jihadist plot raises the question: How’s that Vetting Going?
  • A Terror Case the Travel Ban Would Have Prevented
  • Idiot Lights Blinking: Vetting Failures Still Favor Lying Terrorist Migrants
  • New Terrorism Case-In-Point: Why Somalia Is on the Travel Ban List and Must Stay There
  • Creative Destruction Media: One Afghan Military Interpreter Resettled in New Jersey Went Bad; Smuggled fellow Afghan ‘Security Risk’ over the Texas-Mexico Border
  • The National Interest magazine: Joe Biden Just Condemned America to More Chinese Espionage — and Worse
  • An Afghan Vetting Failure
  • An Interview with Bensman, 20 Years After 9/11: Lessons Learned, Improvements Needed
  • 9/11+ 20: America still struggles to vet entering foreigners for national security threats

How can U.S. officials vet refugees claiming to be from a country with no government records to check?

As when they cross a U.S. land border unknown and with no ID, Somalis who formally apply for refugee resettlement — at, say, a U.S. embassy or refugee camp abroad — present a security challenge to officials trying to separate the malevolent from the benign. Discerning the difference for Somalis is far more problematic than for applicants of most other countries. That’s because from 1991 to 2011, a nearly pure anarchy of civil war and absence of government in Somalia meant no one was issuing birth certificates, driver’s licenses, diplomas, passports, marriage or divorce documents, or any other government records reflecting that citizens even existed. Just as surely, no higher order of bureaucracy was tracking criminal histories or intelligence as to who belonged to terrorist groups.

Fast forward to that security-checking challenge today. Somalis show up at a U.S. embassy, consular office, or refugee camp tent abroad with a refugee application in hand reflecting a name, birth date, and tale of woe. Could American adjudicators simply call up the current Somali government and ask for an identity check or criminal history on any Somali adult?

No. Hence, Somalia’s well-deserved place on President Donald Trump’s “travel ban” country list and a “National Vetting Center” where teams of analysts can more comprehensively investigate such applications.

But anyone knowing all of this about Somalia, who would still call out as unreasonable President Trump’s travel ban, need look no further than married couple Mohamed Abdirahman Osman, 28, and Zeinab Abdirahman Mohamad, 25. Federal prosecutors last month charged the couple in Tucson, Ariz., with 11 collective counts of repeatedly lying on the refugee applications they filed in August 2013 at the American embassy in China and, in 2015, on permanent residency applications in Arizona.

What did Osman and Mohamad allegedly lie about in Beijing successfully enough to win resettlement approval? According to the indictment:

His identity, for starters. His nationality. And then, as it naturally followed: his membership in the U.S.-designated terrorist group al-Shabaab. That he blew his hands off and wrecked vision in one eye by mishandling explosives for the terrorist group. That his brother currently is a member of the terrorist group. That friends and associates are also members of the terrorist group. And that she attested that he was someone else from a different country entirely to help cover it all up.

Osman and Mohamad paid $500 to be smuggled to Beijing via Kenya, where he was given a Somali passport with a visa for China, FBI special agent Benjamin Trenlage testified at a hearing. In Beijing, the couple found purchase in telling the American embassy that the terrorist group al-Shabaab had kidnapped the couple and held them hostage in an abandoned milk factory and that he lost his hands in an al-Shabaab terror attack. This masquerade worked for as long as it did because USCIS officers in Beijing, even during the Obama years, would not have bothered verifying the proffered name, Mustaf Adan Arale, because he claimed he was a Somali national. He even had a fake Somali passport to go with it. After all, why check the story when Somalia had no citizen records to check?

The State Department had this to say about the availability of “general documents”:

The Government of Somalia ceased to exist in December of 1990, and the country underwent a destructive and brutal civil war, in the course of which most records were destroyed. Those few records not destroyed are in the hands of private individuals or are otherwise not retrievable. There are no circumstances under which immigrant visa applicants can reasonably be expected to recover original documents held by the former government of Somalia.

As recently as 2017, Somalia’s current government still had no reliable record-keeping systems in place.

It was good poker for Osman to play the Somali card back in 2013. According to government allegations, Osman was actually a citizen of Ethiopia. He hailed from a town called Jijinga not far from the Somali border known for Islamic separatist sentiment and support for al-Shabaab. According to the State Department’s most recent Country Report on Terrorism, Ethiopia is a strong U.S. counter-terrorism collaborator with mature intelligence systems, tracking of terrorist and separatist groups, and policing infrastructure.

It turns out that investigators believe Osman had plenty to hide when he lied and then enlisted his wife to help with that.

Read the fully story here


Series Navigation<< Idiot Lights Blinking: Vetting Failures Still Favor Lying Terrorist MigrantsCreative Destruction Media: One Afghan Military Interpreter Resettled in New Jersey Went Bad; Smuggled fellow Afghan ‘Security Risk’ over the Texas-Mexico Border >>

Filed Under: Securing America's Borders

Subscribe to Mailing List

Subscribing to my list will entitle subscribers to be alerted to blog posts, articles and writings as they are published, as well as any special announcements.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Bensman’s Newsletter

Sign Up

Bensman’s Books

Cover of America's Covert Boarder War book Cover of Overrun Book

Follow Me Online

Find Bensman on LinkedIn Find Bensman on Twitter Find Bensman on Gettr Find Bensman on Truth Social

Related Posts

On the Ground in Juarez, Mexico: Trump “Remain in Mexico” policy working as UN buses load up Central Americans for rides home. But for how long?
CBP Launches Major Operation in Texas to Catch Covid-Sickened Illegal Immigrants Entering From Mexico; Trump Considers Closing Border Exemptions
Parsing Immigration Podcast:
An American Jihadist Caught in Mexico: What we know
Hold Off! Designating Mexican Cartels as Terrorists Could Dilute War on Jihadists
Migrant Pressure-Cooker Buildup in Balkans Holds Key Lessons for U.S.-Mexico Border Control Policy
Bill Would Designate Mexican Cartels as Something Other Than Terrorists
Twitter series on mandatory catch-and-release stirs coverage and controversy but settled nothing
Border Patrol Reportedly Transporting Covid-Sick Border-Crossers to US Hospitals and Becoming Infected
For CD Media: Last Year’s DHS Threat Assessment Predicted Wave Of Haitian Illegal Migration In A Southern Border Crisis

© 2023 · Todd Bensman · Site By WP Attendant